Still Another Way of Rigging an Election Has Been Discovered! Fractionalizing Votes! One Person, One Vote is True Only Some of The Time!
Vote Fractionalizing and Election Theft
During the conference, Take Back The Vote, that we co-sponsored with the California Election Integrity Coalition, I was introduced to a new very disturbing discovery that is described beautifully in the article from Jon Rappoport below. What is true is that votes are not necessarily weighted evenly in our elections if you are voting on Dominion (Diebold) or possibly with voting machines created by ES&S, systems that cover most of the country.
Here is The Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity fellow, attorney Bob Fitrakis, PhD, JD, talking with Lee Camp about how large corporations control our elections and manage our exit polls with no transparency or accountability.
Bennie Smith & Bev Harris Explain Fractionalized Voting;
Further Discussions About Fraction Magic and the Implications of Its Use in U.S. Elections In the last update, we focused on vote fractionalizing and what can be done about it. Beth Harris, who discovered vote fractionalizing along with Bennie Smith, has finally released both her short 9-minute video on YouTube on vote fractionalizing and her longer one. The short youtube is designed only to awaken interest in the American Public. Many people do not want to watch something long to start with. Do not expect that you can follow it exactly. The longer video is 24 minutes. It follows after the short one listed below.
The Short Video — a Summary: Three key things that struck me in the short video are the following: One is that a master programmer in voting machine companies like Dominion, Hart InterCivic and ES&S can put whatever percentages he or she desires into the tabulator for whatever candidate or proposition they want to see win or lose in any county in the United States! This can all be done at a great distance.This manipulation can be done invisibly and will not show up when the tabulators are tested before the election. Once the chosen percentages have been programmed, the tabulator will fractionalize the votes on election night to match the desired percentages. Of course applying fraction magic” does not happen in every election, but the fact that it can happen in any election is very unsettling.
As mentioned in my earlier update, the only protection against vote fractionalizing is saving ballot images. This is done by making freedom of information requests. If the election official resists, then a TRO to save the ballot images can be presented in court. Guidelines for creating an effective TRO are presented towards the bottom in my last update. There are only ballot images on 40% of scanners in the U.S. There are some ballot images on some DRE’s. Nonetheless, having ballot images for 40% of voters is better than nothing. If the ballot images are saved, the next step is hand counting them which is very easy to accomplish with volunteers in close elections. If you, the reader, feel confused about how to make ballot image requests or how to organize TRO’s, please consult with John Roberts Brakey of Audit Az, who is offering his cell phone number (520) 339-2696 and email firstname.lastname@example.org at this time to help you.
In this longer video you will see security video camera and other cameras taking pictures of technicians taking a tabulator out of an election office, changing something on it in a car and then returning the tabulator to the election office. There is also another short video of another person changing a tabulator within a container inside an election office. That person is currently being held accountable in a lawsuit. It seems evident to me that changes to elections will probably happen with much more frequency using an American insider than a hacking Russian. Additionally, the process of Fraction Magic is explained more slowly and with more detail, although I prefer the explanations in sitsshow.blogspot.com that is displayed above.
In summary, you now have been given a detailed introduction to Fraction Magic and to the solution to the problem. In Part 2, as mentioned before we will go into looking at the companies that can use Fraction Magic and how some of them are hiding their involvement in our 2016 elections.
You can email attorney Robert Fitrakis for assistance in filing ballot image requests at RobertFitrakis@gmail.com or call him at 614 374 2380. Please put the nature of your request in the title of the email to him.
If you want to understand how this kind of election fraud can take place and you do not have a strong background in computers, click on the link immediately below. Part of it is from InfoWars. Although I am aware that a large part of TrustVote’s readership may not want to see anything by Alex Jones, this interview with Bev Harris is really elucidating for people who want to understand Fraction Magic further. The article that follows by progressive writer Jon Rapport is equally helpful as well. Click on the link below and scroll down just below the American flag image for Jon’s article. The YouTube video, “Smoking Gun in Massive Election Fraud Discovered…” is presented as part of his article.
In the following YouTube, you will see hand counting as it is done in our country. Four people sit at a table together. One person reads aloud the vote for the candidate. A second person watches that person do that to make sure the vote was announced correctly. A third person then writes down what was heard and a fourth person watches as it is written down. Again, the YouTube below shows how joyful people are to be involved in their elections. Their registrars are happy, too. One of them is Freddie Oakley from Yolo County, California to whom we gave in absentia one of our awards from the Institute. You can see how happy she and her staff feel about putting care and extra attention into counting the ballots, even if they use tabulators manufactured by Hart InterCivic. Also, they usually do a 10% audit in that county.
The other registrars in the short YouTube, like the one in New Hampshire county who does hand counts, also seems happy with their jobs. Clearly having transparent elections can generate trust, citizen involvement and joy in people rather than distrust, anger and suspicion that has become so rampant in our elections. So many other countries do hand counting: Germany Costa Rica, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Thailand to name only a few. I think we should seek to move towards that too or at least move towards an open source system like the one in Humboldt County. Humboldt County, by the way, counts ballots twice: one is with a tabulator from Hart InterCivic and the other is the tabulator in the open source TEVS system. So far, the results have always come out the same. Additionally, there have been no recount requests ever since they started using the TEVS system, about eight years ago.